Acoustic Emission Testing or Pulsed Eddy Current

Home Forums Forum Acoustic Emission Testing or Pulsed Eddy Current

This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by wyatt hunter wyatt hunter 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #8862
    Bhavesh Sawant
    Bhavesh Sawant
    Participant

    One of my clients had been carrying out AET on the Horton Sphere legs. However they have now come across Pulsed Eddy current testing. Which one would be more accurate

    #9492
    wyatt hunter
    wyatt hunter
    Participant

    Accurate is not the correct comparison. AET is qualitative and ET is quantitative , AET can provide an idea for the severity of damage, ET can quantify (measurements). IF your referring to accuracy for location of damage then ET would probable win. A REAL Validation is required for both methods on this specific application. . I don’t believe anyone has performed this.

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.